ARAI / ICAT vs FMTTI: which approval does your machine actually need?

Manufacturers ask us a version of this question every week: "Do I need ARAI, ICAT, or FMTTI approval for my machine?" The question contains a hidden assumption — that these are alternatives you pick between. They are not. They are different approvals that answer different questions, and for many machines you need more than one.

This guide untangles the two tracks, tells you which applies to your machine, and explains why a tractor maker chasing subsidy demand should run both at once.

Two approvals, two different jobs

There are two regulatory questions a farm machine can face, and each has its own approval track.

Is the machine road-legal? Self-propelled machines that travel on public roads — tractors, power tillers, self-propelled combine harvesters — fall under the Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR). They need type-approval, which is carried out by a CMVR-notified test agency: in practice ARAI (Pune) or ICAT (Manesar). This is what people loosely call "homologation."

Is the machine eligible for subsidy? A machine sold under SMAM or a state subsidy scheme must carry a valid FMTTI performance test report. FMTTI testing is a performance and quality evaluation — it is not about road-legality. It is the gating artifact for getting a model onto a subsidy-empanelment list. (We cover the empanelment mechanics in the SMAM and state subsidy empanelment guide.)

These two are independent. A rotavator or a thresher is a towed or PTO-driven implement that never needs CMVR type-approval — but it absolutely needs FMTTI testing to be subsidy-eligible. A tractor needs both: CMVR type-approval to be sold and registered, and FMTTI testing to be subsidised.

Which track does my machine need?

The pattern: CMVR type-approval is about whether the thing drives itself on a road; FMTTI testing is about whether a farmer can buy it with a subsidy. Most of India's implement makers — the Ludhiana and Karnal clusters, for example — never touch CMVR at all, because they build towed and PTO implements. Their entire certification agenda is FMTTI plus, where applicable, BIS/FMCS.

Run them in parallel, not in sequence

For a subsidised tractor, the single most common mistake is treating these as sequential — finishing type-approval, then starting FMTTI. They are independent workstreams with independent queues, and the emission test work (AIS-137, run at ARAI or ICAT) is a parallel track to the AIS-017 type-approval cycle. Sequencing them end-to-end can add months to launch for no reason.

Start both early. The detailed mechanics of the CMVR side — Rule 126 accreditation, AIS-017 type approval, AIS-137 emission cycles and AIS-037 Conformity of Production — are covered in our CMVR / TREM-IV emission norms guide and the CMVR & TREM-IV service page.

How FMTTI testing actually works

This is where most manufacturers carry an outdated mental model. FMTTI testing is not a mandatory geographic assignment to a regional institute.

Applications are filed through the national Centralized Farm Machinery Performance Testing Portal. The four regional Farm Machinery Training and Testing Institutes denote nominal coverage, not a required centre — the actual testing centre depends on the machine type and capacity:

• CFMTTI Budni (Budni, Madhya Pradesh) — the Central institute
• NRFMTTI Hisar (Hisar, Haryana) — Northern region
• SRFMTTI Anantapur (Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh) — Southern region
• NERFMTTI Biswanath Chariali (Assam) — North-Eastern region

On top of the four institutes, several State Agricultural Universities act as attached testing centres. Two that matter for the clusters we work in: PAU Ludhiana is an attached centre under NRFMTTI Hisar — a genuine local advantage for Ludhiana's dense implement base — and Junagadh Agricultural University is the attached centre near Rajkot, roughly 100 km away, the nearest practical centre for many categories there.

The practical implication: do not assume your "nearest" institute is where you test, and do not assume you are barred from a centre because it is in another state. Choose the centre by machine category and capacity through the portal, and factor in attached-centre proximity where it exists.

What we do

We map the full approval surface for a machine before a manufacturer commits tooling — which CMVR track (if any), which FMTTI route by category, and how to sequence the parallel workstreams so launch is not gated by an avoidable queue. See the ARAI vs ICAT vs FMTTI service for how we run it.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need ARAI or FMTTI approval for a rotavator?

A rotavator is a PTO-driven towed implement, not a self-propelled motor vehicle, so it does not need CMVR type-approval from ARAI or ICAT. What it does need is FMTTI performance testing — that report is the gating artifact for SMAM and state subsidy eligibility. Applications go through the national Centralized Farm Machinery Performance Testing Portal; the nominal regional institute (for example NRFMTTI Hisar in the north) and the actual centre depend on machine type and capacity.

What is the difference between CMVR type-approval and FMTTI testing?

Can ARAI/ICAT and FMTTI approvals run at the same time?

Is my machine assigned to a specific regional FMTTI?

Sources & references(3), 3 items

DK

Written by

Devendra K Jha· Director, AgriMachinery Consulting

Engineer-leader and founder of AgriMachinery Consulting. Works with India's small and unorganised farm-machinery manufacturers on certification, homologation, subsidy empanelment, supply chain and dealer-network strategy from offices in Pune and New Delhi.

• Farm-machinery certification & homologation
• SMAM / state subsidy empanelment
• Manufacturing & supply chain

LinkedIn